Monday, June 12, 2017

The Politics of the Clone Wars: Ham-fisted



The politics are Star Wars…wait don’t groan!

Many people hate the politics on display in the Star Wars prequels, calling them confusing and boring. I’ve never felt this way. I like political theater and I find the fall of the republic a very interesting topic. The Clone Wars covered this issue in depth, but it was not all that it could have been. While some episodes or parts of episodes offer smart insights and commentary on politics, over all the politics of the Clone Wars were simplistic and moralizing.

The politics of the clone wars are ham-fisted. I really have no other way of putting it. This is due to a number of factors; the need to make the material digestible for audiences of all ages is one. But if the writers were trying to break down complex political ideas into easily digestible bits, then they did a disservice to many. While they pay lip service to the complexity of politics and war, they present a very black and white picture. 

Senate episodes of the Clone Wars are among the most painful to sit through. Padme and her friends--a group of good looking aristocrats--are the champions of justice and peace fighting against the usually unattractive, and mostly alien corporate interests who are corrupting the Republic. Setting aside the rather absurd notion that the people’s champions are a group of Politian’s from patrician families—this set up makes politics seem like a one sided fight between good and evil. Many of Padmé’s opponents are not just corrupt but actively taking orders from Count Dooku. We learn though these episodes that the Republic--a very decentralized federation which until the events of the clone wars did not even possess a standing army and left individual systems to basically run their own affairs-- never the less guaranteed basic social services like healthcare. It doesn’t seem to be a stretch to say that rather than good writing this was an attempt to comment on political debates happening in the US at the time, and not a particularly good or subtle one. We also hear mention of bills such as the “enhanced privacy invasion act”. Now I have my doubts that any legislator no matter how corrupt would pass or even consider a bill with a name like “the enhanced privacy invasion act”. They would at least give it a more benign sounding name. 

The interesting thing about these episodes is Palpatine. The way he manipulates both the well intentioned and the greedy to further his own ends is an excellent commentary of authoritarian leaders. Also important is the way he cloaks his ill intentions in thoughtful rhetoric. He uses his closest rivals like Bail Organa to important ends while secretly undermining there position. He feigns love for democracy while quietly moving technocrats and militarists like Willuff Tarken up the ranks. He pretends to respect the Jedi while spreading the idea that they were the root cause of the war. It is ironic that a character meant to embody pure evil is the most complex political figure in the series—all the while the good guys are two dimensional caricatures of what a good politician is supposed to be.  

The lack of complexity in the Republic’s politics carries over to the war. With few exceptions Separatists are portrayed as ugly, morally deficient and sadistic. For the most part their soldiers are not people, but disposable droids. In practice these factors serve to dehumanize the bad guys. Dehumanizing the enemy is a long time practice in war and propaganda. In a fictional setting it trades complexity for a simple morality quite at odds with the real world. Perhaps to would not be good family friendly viewing to show Jedi killing a bunch of humanoid soldiers, but if the clone wars was supposed to be a tragic turning of the galaxy against itself it would make sense that at least some of the separatist officers the Jedi faced would not be pure evil. 

Star Wars has always been about the clash of good and evil. It tends to present moral options in stark terms. There is a clear line between good and evil, and it’s clear which side is which. Politics is not like this. People on both sides of issues tend to believe they are fighting for what is good and right and you can find people with weak and strong moral standards on both sides of the political spectrum. Sanitizing war by dehumanizing the bad guy is also not a real reflection of the world. In attempting to stay true to the central message of the series The Clone Wars ignores a chance to show how strict morality can be applied in a worldly situation. 




No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts